#include "benchmark_base/fft.h" namespace comparison_benchmarks { namespace base { namespace fft { complex_vector generate_input() { std::vector known_frequencies{2, 11, 52, 88, 256}; fft::complex_vector data(SIZE); // Set our input data to match a time series of the known_frequencies. // When applying fft to this time-series we should find these frequencies. for (int i = 0; i < SIZE; i++) { data[i] = std::complex(0.0, 0.0); for (auto frequencie : known_frequencies) { data[i] += sin(2 * M_PI * frequencie * i / SIZE); } } return data; } void divide(complex_vector::iterator data, complex_vector::iterator tmp_odd_elements, int n) { for (int i = 0; i < n / 2; i++) { tmp_odd_elements[i] = data[i * 2 + 1]; } for (int i = 0; i < n / 2; i++) { data[i] = data[i * 2]; } for (int i = 0; i < n / 2; i++) { data[i + n / 2] = tmp_odd_elements[i]; } } void combine(complex_vector::iterator data, int n) { for (int i = 0; i < n / 2; i++) { std::complex even = data[i]; std::complex odd = data[i + n / 2]; // w is the "twiddle-factor". // this could be cached, but we run the same 'base' algorithm parallel/serial, // so it won't impact the performance comparison. std::complex w = exp(std::complex(0, -2. * M_PI * i / n)); data[i] = even + w * odd; data[i + n / 2] = even - w * odd; } } void conquer(complex_vector::iterator data, complex_vector::iterator swap_array, int n) { if (n < 2) { return; } divide(data, swap_array, n); conquer(data, swap_array, n / 2); conquer(data + n / 2, swap_array + n / 2, n / 2); combine(data, n); } } } }