Commit 256a0f82 by Danila Klimenko

UniqueLock class: "Swap" method now actually swaps ownership of the wrapped mutexes

parent 5abeb065
......@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#define EMBB_BASE_INTERNAL_MUTEX_INL_H_
#include <cassert>
#include <algorithm>
namespace embb {
namespace base {
......@@ -95,8 +96,8 @@ void UniqueLock<Mutex>::Unlock() {
template<typename Mutex>
void UniqueLock<Mutex>::Swap(UniqueLock<Mutex>& other) {
locked_ = other.locked_;
mutex_ = other.Release();
std::swap(mutex_, other.mutex_);
std::swap(locked_, other.locked_);
}
template<typename Mutex>
......
......@@ -439,11 +439,11 @@ class UniqueLock {
void Unlock();
/**
* Transfers ownership of a mutex to this lock.
* Exchanges ownership of the wrapped mutexes with another lock.
*/
void Swap(
UniqueLock<Mutex>& other
/**< [IN/OUT] Lock from which ownership shall be transferred */
/**< [IN/OUT] The lock to exchange ownership with */
);
/**
......
......@@ -191,13 +191,29 @@ void MutexTest::TestUniqueLock() {
}
{ // Test lock swapping
UniqueLock<> lock1;
// Create a second mutex to swap with
Mutex another_mutex;
UniqueLock<> lock1(another_mutex);
PT_EXPECT_EQ(lock1.OwnsLock(), true);
{
UniqueLock<> lock2(mutex_);
PT_EXPECT_EQ(lock1.OwnsLock(), false);
PT_EXPECT_EQ(lock2.OwnsLock(), true);
lock1.Swap(lock2);
PT_EXPECT_EQ(lock1.OwnsLock(), true);
PT_EXPECT_EQ(lock2.OwnsLock(), false);
PT_EXPECT_EQ(lock2.OwnsLock(), true);
}
// At this point, lock2 was destroyed and "another_mutex" must be unlocked
UniqueLock<> lock3(another_mutex, embb::base::try_lock);
PT_EXPECT_EQ(lock3.OwnsLock(), true);
// But lock1 must still be locking "mutex_"
PT_EXPECT_EQ(lock1.OwnsLock(), true);
lock1.Release()->Unlock();
PT_EXPECT_EQ(lock1.OwnsLock(), false);
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or sign in to comment